References: [1986] RTR 113
Ratio:The defendant had been convicted of driving with excess alcohol. He challenged the use of a machine for the breath test which was not an Intoximeter.
Held: The charge was valid.
This case is cited by:
- Cited – Brown -v- Gallagher HCJ (Times 03-Jun-02)
The appellant contended that the Intoximeter which had been used to measure the level of alcohol in his breath, had not been manufactured by the approved manufacturer, and did not therefore satisfy the type approval, and that the inconsistency in . . - Cited – Gary Brown -v- Procurator Fiscal, Falkirk HCJ (ScotC, [2002] ScotHC 25)
The defendant appealed conviction for driving with excess alcohol. He complained that the machine used to take his sample of breath did not conform to the necessary type. It had been manufactured by an independent company. Though not approved it was . .
(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 07-Jul-16
Ref: 182986