Teape -v- Godfrey; 1986

References: [1986] RTR 213
Ratio:
This case is cited by:

• Not to be followed – Piggott -v- Director of Public Prosecutions Admn (Bailii, [2008] EWHC 305 (Admin), Times 10-Mar-08)
  The defendant driver had been stopped and required to provide a specimen of breath. She failed to do so, and gave no reason. At trial she produced nedical evidence, accepted by the magistrates, that she suffered asthma and a hyperventilation . .

(This list may be incomplete)

Last Update: 10-Jun-16
Ref: 266481