Hassan v Director of Public Prosecutions: 1992

References: [1992] RTR 209
Ratio: The defendant said there had been no sign plate displaying the times of restricted parking.
Held: That was a failure to provide adequate information, and the motorist’s conviction was quashed.
This case is cited by:

• Cited – Herron and Another., Regina (on The Application of) v The Parking Adjudicator CA (Bailii, [2011] EWCA Civ 905)
  The claimant appealed against refusal of judicial review of decisions of the parking adjudicator as to the correctness of 39 penalty charge notices. In each case, they said that the signage supporting the notice, in particular single and double . .

(This list may be incomplete)

Last Update: 04 April 2017
Ref: 442553

The post Hassan v Director of Public Prosecutions: 1992 appeared first on swarb.co.uk.