Evidence called by prosecutor of breathalyser machine was admissible even though the regulations for the type of machine used had not been notified for this purpose as required to the European Commission. The failure created no obstacle to trade.
Times 20-Jul-1998, Gazette 09-Sep-1998, C-226/97, Ecj/Cfi Bulletin 16/98, 7, [1998] ECR I-3711
Bailii
Directive 83/189/EEC
Cited by:
Cited – Regina v Budimir and Another CACD 29-Jun-2010
The defendants sought leave to appeal out of time saying that their convictions had been under the 1984 Act which was later found to have been unenforceable for failure to comply with notification requirements under European law. The 1984 Act had . .
[2010] EWCA Crim 1486, [2010] WLR (D) 166, [2010] EWHC 1604 (Admin)
These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 18 December 2020; Ref: scu.82527 br>
The post Criminal Proceedings Against Johannes Martinus Lemmens: ECJ 16 Jun 1998 appeared first on swarb.co.uk.