References: [2009] RTR 35, [2009] EWHC 1172 (Admin)
Links: Bailii
Coram: Maurice Kay LJ, Collins J
Ratio: The defendant appealed against a decision not to find special reasons for not endorsing lis licence on his plea of guilty to speeding. He was a diabetic and had anticipated an hypoglycaemic attack. He had increased his speed so as to be able to draw to the side and take glucose.
Held: Though the court might have wished to be sympathetic, the law had been applied correctly. The appeal failed.
This case cites:
- Cited – Chatters v Burke QBD ([1986] RTR 396, [1986] 3 All ER 168)
A car had rolled over and stopped in a field next to the highway and was then driven with a flat tyre a few yards from the field through a gate, onto the road and parked there.
Held: In determining whether special reasons existed to justify . .
(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 13 September 2019
Ref: 346856
The post Davies v Crown Prosecution Service (Bradford): Admn 13 May 2009 appeared first on swarb.co.uk.