References: [2008] EWHC 1896 (QB), [2008] RTR 31
Links: Bailii
Coram: Walker J
Ratio: After a car crash claims were settled for some claims but the defendant said that one claimant had not been in the car at the time.
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
This case is cited by:
- Appeal from – Shah v Ul-Haq and Others CA ([2009] RTR 27, [2010] WLR 616, [2009] CP Rep 39, [2010] 1 All ER 73, [2010] 1 WLR 616, Bailii, [2009] EWCA Civ 542, Times)
The defendant appealed against a refusal to strike out the claimant’s action saying that the claimant had been involved in a fraud upon the court in an earlier associated claim.
Held: The Rule gave no power to strike out a claim on such a . .
(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 05 July 2019
Ref: 271315
The post Ul-Haq and others v Shah: QBD 31 Jul 2008 appeared first on swarb.co.uk.