Coles and Others v Hetherton and Others: CA 20 Dec 2013

References: [2013] EWCA Civ 1704
Links: Bailii
Coram: Moore-Bick, Aikens, Vos LJJ
Ratio: The claimants’ insurers disputed arrangements by the defendants’ insurers in motor accident claims which, they said artificially inflated the costs of repairs to the profit of the defendants’ insurers.
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
This case cites:

• See Also – Coles and Others v Hetherton and Others ComC (Bailii, [2011] EWHC 2405 (Comm))
  Parties challenged the method used by the Royal and Sun Alliance insurance to calculate the cost of repairs to motor vehicles damaged in accidents. After conflicting decisions in County Courts, the issue was brought before the Commercial Court.
  
• Appeal from – Coles and Others v Hetherton and Others ComC (Bailii, [2012] EWHC 1599 (Comm))
  . .

(This list may be incomplete)

Last Update: 25 January 2019
Ref: 519317

The post Coles and Others v Hetherton and Others: CA 20 Dec 2013 appeared first on swarb.co.uk.