References: [2013] EWHC 366 (Admin)
Links: Bailii
Coram: Goldring LJ, Fulford J
Ratio: The defendant appealed against his speeding conviction, seeking to challenge the accuracy of the police officer’s speed measuring device.
Held: The appeal failed. There was not the need to certify the device in the way suggested by the appellant.
This case cites:
- Cited – Nicholas v Penny QBD ([1950] 2 KB 466, [1950] 2 All ER 89)
A police officer’s assessment of a defendant’s speed could be corroborated by evidence as to the reading of a speedometer, even if the latter device had not been checked for the accuracy of its reading, unless there were particular reasons for . .
(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 06 January 2019
Ref: 472811
The post Clarke v Crown Prosecution Service: Admn 7 Feb 2013 appeared first on swarb.co.uk.