References: [2010] EWHC 1769 (Admin), (2010) 174 JP 562
Links: Bailii
Coram: Mitting J
Ratio: The defendant appealed against his conviction for speeding (103mph in 50mph zone). He complained that the section 9 statement remained unsigned.
Held: The appeal failed. There had been no breach of section 9. Nobody could have misunderstood the intent and meaning of the statement.
Statutes: Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 84 89(1), Criminal Procedure Rules 2005, Criminal Justice Act 1967 9(1) 9(2)
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Last Update: 21 December 2018
Ref: 421048
The post Wood v Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 30 Jun 2010 appeared first on swarb.co.uk.