References: [2005] EWHC 1781 (Admin)
Links: Bailii
Coram: Walker J
Ratio: The defendant wished to argue a point to overturn the decision in Chesters. Accordingly the matter was adjourned for hearing by a two judge court.
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
This case cites:
- Cited – Owen v Chesters ([1985] RTR 191)
The court considered the means of proving the reading from a breath test meter: ‘It was clearly the intention of the legislature, in enacting subsection (5), that the defendant should be provided in advance of the hearing with the information . .
(This list may be incomplete)
This case is cited by:
- See Also – Sneyd v Director of Public Prosecutions Admn (Bailii, [2006] EWHC 560 (Admin))
The defendant appealed against his conviction for driving with excess alcohol. He complained that though the officers suspected him of having consumed alcohol, they asked him whether he had been drinking without cautioning him, and that no print out . . - Cited – Bielecki v The Director of Public Prosecutions Admn (Bailii, [2011] EWHC 2245 (Admin))
The court had delivered a draft judgment which counsel said was based upon a fundamental misunderstanding of the case she had presented. Counsel now suggested that the matter should be referred to a two judge divisional court. That was refused. The . .
(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 01 December 2018
Ref: 229744
The post Sneyd, Regina (on the Application Of) v Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 22 Jul 2005 appeared first on swarb.co.uk.