References: [2001] EWCA Civ 32, [2001] EWCA Civ 1211
Links: Bailii, Bailii
Ratio:
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
This case is cited by:
- Appeal from – White v White and The Motor Insurers Bureau HL (House of Lords, Times 06-Mar-01, Gazette 12-Apr-01, Bailii, [2001] UKHL 9, [2001] 2 All ER 43, [2001] 1 WLR 481, [2001] 1 LLR 679, [2001] 1 All ER (Comm) 1105, [2001] PIQR P20, [2001] 2 CMLR 1, [2001] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 679, [2001] RTR 25, [2001] Lloyds Rep IR 493)
The requirements as to the extent of knowledge in the mind of a passenger sufficient to defeat a claim against the Motor Insurers Bureau, of the driver’s lack of insurance, was actual knowledge. The rules implemented a European Directive which . . - See Also – Mighell v Reading and Another and Evans v Motor Insurers Bureau and White v White and Another CA (Times 12-Oct-98, Bailii, [1998] EWCA Civ 1465, [1999] 1 LLR 30)
Passengers were injured in motor vehicles. The drivers were uninsured, and the MIB had declined to make payment. The doctrine of direct effect did not apply where the allegation was that the Motor Insurers Bureau arrangement did not comply with a . .
(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 31 October 2018
Ref: 147396
The post Evans v Secretary of State for Environment, Transport and Regions Motor Insurers’ Bureau: CA 18 Jan 2001 appeared first on swarb.co.uk.