References: Gazette 27-Oct-1999, Times 12-Aug-1999, [1999] EWHC Admin 721
Links: Bailii
Ratio: It was not absolutely necessary for a defendant who asserted that a Lion Intoximeter was faulty because of a disparity between the reading and what had been drunk, to bring expert evidence to rebut the statutory presumption that the Intoximeter was in working order. A court could reach such a conclusion without such evidence, but should be careful to examine all relevant aspects of the evidence.
The prosecutor appealed against dismissal of a charge under section 5. The magistrates heard that the reading was exceptionally high, but that the police had not noticed any effect on her demeanour and it had been twelve hours since she had consumed any alcohol.
Held: The case bumped up against the limits for magistrates to act without expert evidence, but the appeal failed. Their decision was not perverse. It was not absolutely necessary for a defendant who asserted that a Lion Intoximeter was faulty because of a disparity between the reading and what had been drunk, to bring expert evidence to rebut the statutory presumption that the Intoximeter was in working order. A court could reach such a conclusion without such evidence, but should be careful to examine all relevant aspects of the evidence.
Statutes: Road Traffic Act 1988 5(1)
This case cites:
- Cited – Cracknell v Willis HL ([1988] RTR 1, [1988] AC 450)
The evidence which is admissible on a challenge to the reliability of an intoximeter device is not limited to direct evidence of the unreliability of the breath testing device, but can be based on evidence such as the level of consumption, and the . . - Cited – Director of Public Prosecutions v Hill ([1991] RTR 35)
The prosecutor appealed against dismissal of a summons alleging that the driver had driven with excess alcohol. The magistrates had concluded that the intoximeter must have been faulty.
Held: The conclusion that the device was unreliable was . .
(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 03 October 2018
Ref: 80049
The post Director of Public Prosecutions v Spurrier: QBD 21 Jul 1999 appeared first on swarb.co.uk.